Progress Markers reflect the intervention's knowledge of the changes required for the Boundary Partner to understanding and fulfill its roles and responsibilities as implied in the vision statement. Progress Markers identify actions and interrelationships that will continue beyond the life and influence of the intervention - the patterns of behaviour and adaptation that will continue without further support from the time bound intervention.
In formulating Pro... Read more ▼
Progress Markers reflect the intervention's knowledge of the changes required for the Boundary Partner to understanding and fulfill its roles and responsibilities as implied in the vision statement. Progress Markers identify actions and interrelationships that will continue beyond the life and influence of the intervention - the patterns of behaviour and adaptation that will continue without further support from the time bound intervention.
In formulating Progress Markers it is ideal if the Boundary Partner can participate in some way, either at the blank page stage or in discussing an early draft. Among the Progress Markers, try to include actions related to adaptive management and self-organizing behaviour as well as the use of monitoring and evaluation.
One way to think about Progress Markers is to visualize a transformation of deepening competence and commitment and to develop milestones for each of the following stages in such a journey:
The specificity of the Progress Markers depends on the intervention's knowledge of the situation and the stakeholders and on the diversity within the Boundary Partner category. With detailed knowledge or with little diversity, the Progress Markers can be quite specific.
Nuggets related to this section:
It can be useful to give varying weights to the data points agreed upon for each Progress Marker or to assign them weights depending on the frequency an event (a data point) is observed. For example, under the fairly general Progress Marker 'using community feedback to adjust its programs', data showing that the intervention was monitoring the level fo community participation might count, but with a lower weight than, say, meeting quarterly with a community advisory committee to review program activities. An action that would count with an even higher weighting might be:including in annual reports a section on adjustments made to program activities based on community inputs.
Nuggets related to this section:
During the design stage of larger programmes, teams often need to decide whether they formulate over-all / generic Outcome Challenges and Progress Markers for each type of boundary partner or tailor-made Outcome Challenges and Progress Markers for each single boundary partner.
We still need nuggets for this section! Please add your nugget...
A set of Progress Markers can be changed sand adapated during the lifespan of the project /programme. What are the experiences of practitioners in adapting progress markersd during the course of the programme?
We still need nuggets for this section! Please add your nugget...